Go Back   TheJCBoard.com Jersey City, Hoboken, Bayonne and North Jersey » Blogs

description
Old

6/18 Bayonne City Council Meeting - Last Minute Fireworks

Posted 06-18-2008 at 07:34 PM by neilbarton
Box movers making $37 an hour. Some workers making up to $75 an hour. What are these rates for? Working the city elections. It seems that a "tradition" has been set up over time to give the city workers an extra "bonus" in their salary for working early & late hours on election day.

This issue came up as a last item on the agenda at the council meeting. The motion to pay the salaries was requested to be tabled until July. However City Clerk Sloan requested that it not be tabled, and insisted on a vote quite adamantly. These workers were under his direction, and he wanted to see them paid. The tension rose quickly, with Mr. Sloan's assistant providing an emotional outburst agianst the city councilmen.

The debate apepars to be over the legality of Mr. Sloan to set the rates that are paid to the city workers. Councilman Chiappone (as well as other council persons) believe that, legally, the rates should be set by City Council.

At one point a city worker came up to challenge the city council, whio is obviously doing it's best to scrutinize any out of line expense. This worker said there would be chaos if not for the work the city workers do on election day, and that we would find no one to do the work if the rates were cut. Mr Lapilusa responded: "I am pretty confident that at half the rate that you get paid, we can get someone in here"

Ultimately the resolution to pay the workers passed, with a promise that the issue would be looked into.
Member
Posted in CityCouncil
Comments 2 neilbarton is offline
Old

Time to get over big government

Posted 06-09-2008 at 01:27 PM by neilbarton
Thanks to Stan for finding this, I thought it should be reprinted here in full:

I have had a depressingly high number of conversations lately about New Jersey being a sinking ship. There are three themes. The most common is that the state is broke and that nobody seems to have the political will to fix it. The second theme, recently voiced to me by a veteran Democratic legislator, is that "nothing we've done is working anymore." In other words, we need new approaches to many of our key public policy challenges.

The third theme is that wasteful spending on big-ticket items is hurting priorities such as the environment, state parks, health care for our neediest residents and the like.

Democrats are supposed to be progressive. But lately, we look too much like defenders of the status quo. In fact, another Democrat with vast experience in Trenton re cently said to me that our system has become "of the government, by the government and for the government."

The Democratic Party here has to decide whether it is the party of the people or the party of the insiders. There is a conflict because a high proportion of those who vote in primaries benefit from the status quo. One out of eight New Jerseyans works in the public sector, and these people vote. They are mostly good and dedicated people. But we have overstaffed units of government and too many layers of it. That is the main reason we have such high property taxes.

Bloated government can be cut without harming essential services. It does almost no good to trim around the edges; closing state parks is primarily symbolic. We have to focus on the key items that drive the cost of government. The big tickets are education, public safety, the cost of retirement benefits, the cost of incarcerating nonvi olent offenders and overlapping units of government.

We are spending more money than ever on the Abbott districts despite evidence that hundreds of millions of dollars are being wasted. Huge buyout packages appear to be only the tip of the iceberg. There are rigged contracts, construction cost overruns, administrative fat and expensive state mandates.

We are not allowed even to discuss productivity in education, and it is virtually impossible to get rid of incompetent teachers. Meanwhile, some of our best and brightest college grads can't get in to Teach for America because the education bureaucracy doesn't want too many of them.

The next big ticket is public safety. According to PoliceLink, New Jersey offers the highest law enforcement compensation in the country, with an average median salary of $70,470. Moreover, there are wide gaps within the state. Why does a starting patrolman in Princeton get paid 71 percent more than a new one in Trenton? Why can many cops get paid for four hours of overtime for as little as 15 minutes of work? Can we really call government efficient...
Member
Posted in Uncategorized
Comments 3 neilbarton is offline
Old

The details of my Fri May 30th deposition

Posted 05-31-2008 at 11:30 PM by neilbarton

<p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal">I arrived at the Port Authority offices at 225 Park Ave at about 4:15PM. I was awaiting a call from Couselor Steven Gorelick, attorney for Stern &amp; Kilcullen representing the Port Authority. However, Mr. Gorelick failed to call me to advise me to confirm if we were still on for 4PM. Therefore I made an assumption that things were still a go. It was good that I did.</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal">I was greeted by Port Authority attorney Jay Selcov. He was very gracious and polite. He spoke with me for a while, as we waited the current deposition to complete.<span> </span>I found Mr. Selcov to be the polar opposite of Mr. Gorelick. To meet Mr. Selcov is to meet a man who is congenial, seems to enjoy life, and has an easy going way about him. Mr. Gorelick, however, plays the part of a crafty/weasely/conniving lawyer straight out of Hollywood central casting. Short in stature with a direct manner with he had a smile that you just can’t seem to bring yourself to trust.</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal">Also present with Mr. Gorelick was another attorney, Howard Tat. Other than appearing to handle the paperwork he spoke little. Representing the BLRA from McManimon &amp; Scotland was Attorney Jamie Placek.</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal">Mr. Gorelick did not let me down in his performance once the deposition began. I had suspected that my deposition would have little or nothing to do with the current case of Port Authority v. BLRA and everything to do with attempting to discover information that might allow the Port Authority to try and have my case dismissed. This soon became apparent to Mr. Placek as well, who, to his credit (and in his client’s interest) began a surprisingly heated exchange with Mr. Gorelick. He was adamant that Mr. Gorelick’s line of questioning had nothing to do with the current case. He instructed Mr. Gorelick that he should be advising me, as a witness without representation with a Pro Se complaint pending against Mr. Gorelick’s client that the questions he were asking me could potentially harm my own case, and that if the judge were aware of the tactics that Mr. Gorelick was attempting that he might not approve of such actions. Mr. Gorelick said that he was under no obligation to advise me of such, so Mr. Placek went on record and advised me of such, and then further stated that he would be objecting to the questions Mr. Gorelick would be asking me for the rest of the session.</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal">Mr. Gorelick attempted to “Trap” me into admitting that I knew of the 45 day time limit on my ability to file. However, following the heated exchange between he &amp; Mr. Placek,...
Member
Posted in BLRA
Comments 18 neilbarton is offline
Old

The Port Authority delays deposition

Posted 05-28-2008 at 02:47 PM by neilbarton
<span style="font-family: 'Georgia','serif'">As I mentioned earlier, the Port Authority subpoenaed me to a deposition that was due to happen today at 3:30PM in Newark, NJ. At expense to myself I left work early from Manhattan in order to make it to the deposition on time, only to be told that they had served me the wrong subpoena. </span><span style="font-family: 'Georgia','serif'">They requested I come back tomorrow at 12:30 in the afternoon, I explained to them that this was not possible. I am now tentatively scheduled to be deposed in the Port Authority offices in Manhattan on Friday at 4PM. </span>

<span style="font-family: 'Georgia','serif'"><o></o></span><span style="font-family: 'Georgia','serif'">I complied with their order to produce any documentation that I had in relation to the case I filed. That documentation consisted of my original and final legal drafts and a short email exchange with city Law Director Jay Coffey, with whom I contacted after writing a letter to the Judge that presides over the PA v. BLRA case expressing my dismay/inability to have a greater voice as a citizen. In that conversation Mr. Coffey informed me that I was incorrect in my assumption that I was unable to get legally involved (as I detailed in the letter to the judge) and provided the legal statues that existed. </span><span style="font-family: 'Georgia','serif'">Other than that email chain, all other communications other persons happened either on this website or in person. </span><span style="font-family: 'Georgia','serif'"><o></o></span><span style="font-family: 'Georgia','serif'">As always I hide nothing and continue to press for open &amp; informed debate. I cannot imagine what the PA lawyers would need to know from me beyond this as it is all recorded here. I will post again after my deposition, if it occurs on Friday. <o></o></span>
Member
Comments 5 neilbarton is offline
Old

How much did the Bayonne Economic Development Corporation Pay in the Lawsuit?

Posted 05-27-2008 at 02:40 PM by neilbarton
The big subject of the day over at the nj.com Bayonne forum is attempting to solve the question: How much did the Bayonne Economic Development Corporation, a quasi autonomous agency, pay out in it's recent lawsuit settlement. You can read about it here.

Well folks, file this one under "RumorMill" because I don't have any hard evidence as of yet... but here is what I have heard from speaking with a few people. The estimates that were mentioned on NJ.com that have varied between $200K &amp; $400K may be high. I have heard that it is more likely that the number is lower, under $100K.

However, even if I were to file an OPRA request to the agency, I will be unable to yield the actual dollar amount won in the suit, as an insurance agency most certainly paid out the bulk of the sum.

Based on this fact alone, I would make an educated guess that the amount of money actually paid by the BEDC was around $10-20K in the form of a deductible insurance payment.

I am going to attempt to follow up on this story however, as I have been told that there may be some interesting information that might be gotten from using OPRA to get a copy of the original complaint.
Member
Posted in RumorMill
Comments 0 neilbarton is offline

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:16 AM.
style developed @ GFXstyles
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.